Derik Schneider Online

Sunday, 5 May 2013

Public Resource: Video: Longines Chronoscope: Dr. Norman Thomas From 1952- Democratic Socialist Foreign Policy

Democratic Socialist 
Public Resource: Video: Longines Chronoscope: Dr. Norman Thomas From 1952- Democratic Socialist Foreign Policy

What I respect about Norman Thomas even though he was a Socialist and we probably agree on almost nothing as it relates to economic policy, is that he was a real Democrat. A real American Democrat, a real Democratic Socialist. Who was probably against communism as much as any Conservative, or Liberal and spoked out against communism. Which is different from socialism. Socialism, is democratic and communism is authoritarian. At least in how its been practiced around the world. He wasn’t one of these far lefties that spoke up in favor of Communists and other authoritarians, who were dictators around the world. For a couple of reasons. One, he was against communism, but also because of how badly socialism has been made to look like.

Thanks to the success of right-wingers, going back at least since the late 1960s in America, socialism has been made to look like communism. As if they are part of the same philosophy, because they are not. And Democratic Socialists like Norman Thomas tend to believe in at least a certain level of capitalism and private enterprise. Just not at the expense of the people and what want as many people as possible to benefit from private enterprise. Norman Thomas, was the Bernie Sanders of his time. He and Henry Wallace, another Democratic Socialist, who ran for president for the Progressive Party in 1948, were very similar when it came to economic policy. But Thomas, was perhaps not as much as a dove when it came to foreign affairs and national security.

If you pay attention to this video, you consistently hear Norman Thomas criticize the Soviet Union, totalitarianism and even communism. That the Russian people, were essentially subjects of the Russian Government in the Soviet Union. You didn’t hear him unlike others on the Far-Left in America, try to claim that Russia was misunderstood during the Cold War. Or even try to suggest that America might have been the bad guys in that war of words. Or even the wrong country won that war. Thomas, was a Socialist in the European sense. Democratic in nature and even supported capitalism and private enterprise. But wanted a big central government to manage the resources of the country and support the people with a welfare state. So no one would have to go without, or have too much, according to him.


Tigerray: Video: ABC Sports: FBS 1986: Clemson Tigers @ Georgia Bulldogs: Full Game

http://youtu.be/MS9UDBh81n8

A great ACC-SEC football rivalry

Noonkick: Video: ABC Sports: FBS 1986: Notre Dame Fighting Irish @ Alabama Crimson Tide: Full Game

http://youtu.be/MYm02TKf8VU

1986 was definitely a rebuilding year for Lou Holtz at Notre Dame

Carl Milton: Video: ABC Sports: FBS-SEC 1985: Alabama Crimson Tide @ Georgia Bulldogs: Full Game

http://youtu.be/cFZUJp_770E

An under appreciated rivalry in SEC football

Syrinx Temple: Video: ABC Sports: FBS-SEC 1992: Alabama Crimson Tide @ Louisiana Tigers: 11/07/1992: Full Game

http://youtu.be/Mr3tvptJbRI

Not many better rivalries in SEC football right now

CBS News: Face The Nation With Bob Schieffer: The Confident Defeat That Wasn't

Courtesy CBS News Face The Nation-
Source: CBS News: Face The Nation With Bob Schieffer- The Confident Defeat That Wasn't

The fact is there wasn't any Democrat who could even beat President Nixon in 1972, or even give him a tough race, was because of the disarray in the Democratic Party between it's center-Left and Far-Left. Similar to how the Republican Party is today. And there wasn't a Democrat who could bring those two sides together. But even without the emergence of the McGovernites that put all of their support behind Senator George McGovern in 1972, I think they would have a hard time defeating President Nixon. Because of the emerging Southern base in the Republican Party and that the Democrats hadn't locked down the Northeast and West Coast, as well as big Midwestern cities as far as their base. African-Americans and Latinos, were still voting Republican in 1972.

Compared with the late 1960s at least 1972 looked like a fairly peaceful and establishment friendly year. And when that is the case the party in power and that is the party with the presidency, tends to do well. Even if the young Baby Boomers and the broader New-Left in the Democratic Party felt differently. The Vietnam War was ending, America was negotiating with Russia and China and opening up a relationship with the People's Republic of China. The country by in large felt pretty good. The Great Deflation of the 1970s that basically hammered the American economy from really 1973 on, hadn't happen yet. So when the country is like this they tend to feel fairly good and aren't looking for a change in leadership.